Multiple Comparisons: Bonferroni Corrections and False Discovery Rates
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Statistical analysis of a data set typically involves testing not just a single hypothesis, but rather many (often very many!). For any particular test, we may assign a pre-set probability α of a type-1 error (i.e., a false positive, rejecting the null hypothesis when in fact it is true). The problem is that using a (say) value of α = 0.05 means that roughly one out of every twenty such tests will show a false positive (rejecting the null hypothesis when in fact it is true). Thus, if our experiment involves performing 100 tests, we expect 5 to be declared as significant if we use a value ofα = 0.05 for each. This is the problem of multiple comparisons, in that we would like to control the false positive rate not just for any single test but also for the entire collection (or family) of tests that makes up our experiment.
منابع مشابه
False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies.
OBJECTIVES Procedures for controlling the false positive rate when performing many hypothesis tests are commonplace in health and medical studies. Such procedures, most notably the Bonferroni adjustment, suffer from the problem that error rate control cannot be localized to individual tests, and that these procedures do not distinguish between exploratory and/or data-driven testing vs. hypothes...
متن کاملThe problem of multiple testing and its solutions for genom-wide studies
The problem of multiple testing and its solutions for genome-wide studies. Even if there is no real change, the traditional p = 0.05 can cause 5% of the investigated tests being reported significant. Multiple testing corrections have been developed to solve this problem. Here the authors describe the one-step (Bonferroni), multi-step (step-down and step-up) and graphical methods. However, somet...
متن کاملControlling Error in Multiple Comparisons, with Examples from State-to-State Differences in Educational Achievement
Three alternative procedures to adjust significance levels for multiplicity are the traditional Bonferroni technique, a sequential Bonferroni technique developed by Hochberg (1988), and a sequential approach for controlling the false discovery rate proposed by Benjamini and Hochberg (1995). These procedures are illustrated and compared using examples from the National Assessment of Educational ...
متن کاملFalse positive rates in standard analyses of eye movements in reading
Abstract: In research on eye movements in reading, it is common to analyze a number of canonical dependent measures in order to study how the effects of a manipulation unfold over time. Although this gives rise to the well-known multiple comparisons problem, i.e. an inflated probability that the null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected (Type I error), it is accepted standard practice not to appl...
متن کاملFalse Discovery and False Nondiscovery Rates in Single - Step Multiple Testing Procedures
Results on the false discovery rate (FDR) and the false nondiscovery rate (FNR) are developed for single-step multiple testing procedures. In addition to verifying desirable properties of FDR and FNR as measures of error rates, these results extend previously known results, providing further insights, particularly under dependence, into the notions of FDR and FNR and related measures. First, co...
متن کامل